National Electrical Installation Standards

Standards as High as Your Own

 
?
Thursday, October 23, 2014

Question:

Re: CQD answer published Monday, Oct 20, 2014 IBT

Charlie (I love that name):

Concerning Don's question on 10/17/14, the National Electrical Safety Code applies up to the service point for communications companies and its rules are basically the same as the NEC requirements. The NESC even refers to the NEC in Note 1. Rule 099C is reproduced from the 2012 Edition of the National Electrical Safety Code below:

Bonding of electrodes

A bond not smaller than AWG No. 6 copper or equivalent shall be placed between the communication grounding electrode and the supply system neutral grounding electrode where separate electrodes are used at the structure or building being served. All separate electrodes shall be bonded together except where separation is required per Rule 97.

RECOMMENDATION: If water piping is used as a bonding means, care must be taken to assure that the metallic path is continuous between electrodes.

NOTE 1: See NEC Article 800-100(D) for corresponding NEC requirements.

NOTE 2: The bonding together of all separate electrodes limits potential differences between them and between their associated wiring systems.

I put the attached PowerPoint file together a long time ago for educating one of our local communications companies when they were not complying with these requirements. I referred to the same NESC Rule above but the PowerPoint was to show the reason behind the NESC and the NEC rules.

Take care, Charlie Eldridge, Consultant

A

Answer:

Hey Charlie, with the great name, good to hear from you.

I took Don's question to mean how can the NEC rules apply to the communication utility, and as I stated they do not. Thanks for providing the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) information but it seems to stop short of specifically requiring the use of the Intersystem Bonding Termination (IBT) where one exists. So the NEC requires an IBT to be installed but the NESC seems to permit bonding by using a 6 AWG conductor. Maybe adding a requirement to use the IBT where one exists should be added to the NESC to close the loop.

250.94

ABOUT CQD: The Code Question of the Day (CQD) is NECA and ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Magazine’s flagship National Electrical Code (NEC®) public forum for the industry, sponsored by EATON. The daily distribution of Q&A generates a lively dialogue and shares relative Code-based practical responses.

SUBMIT YOUR CODE QUESTION: Click here to submit a question to for inclusion in an upcoming edition of the Code Question of the Day, or email codequestion@necanet.org

CHARLIE TROUT: Charles M. Trout, better known as Charlie, was a nationally known NEC® expert and author. He served on several NEC® technical committees and is past chairman of CMP-12. In 2006 Charlie was awarded the prestigious Coggeshall Award for outstanding contributions to the electrical contracting industry, codes and standards development, and technical training. Even though Charlie passed away in October of 2015, his work continues in spirit. NECA continues to maintain this question forum for its many subscribers in memory and recognition of all his significant contributions to making the NEC what it is today.

NECA STANDARDS: NECA publishes the National Electrical Installation Standards™ (NEIS™), a series of ANSI-approved performance and quality standards for electrical construction. NEIS can be purchased in the NECA Store in three formats: a printed or  PDF download of a standard or, as an  annual subscription service.

NECA SAFETY PRODUCTS & PUBLICATIONS: NECA produces electrical safety publications and products for the industry including jobsite safety guides, handbooks and resource kits. View a full listing of available resources and products »

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Unless the question requests a response based on a specific edition, all answers are based on the latest edition of NFPA 70® National Electrical Code®.

This correspondence is not a formal interpretation of the NEC® and any responses expressed to the questions are opinions and do not necessarily represent the official position of NECA, NFPA, the NEC Correlating Committee any Code-making panel or other electrical technical committee. In addition, this correspondence is neither intended, nor should it be relied upon, to provide professional consultation or services. 

UPDATE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION PREFERENCES: Subscribe or Unsubscribe from this list.