National Electrical Installation Standards

Standards as High as Your Own

 
?
Wednesday, February 8, 2017

Question:

Fiber Optic cable routed in a Class 2 Division 1 location. OSP fiber optic cable typically doesn’t have a metallic component to it, so does it require to be installed in rigid conduit and NEMA 9 enclosures when routed through Class 2 Division 1 Location? I believe that it does per Article 502.10(A) (1) (4).

Confusion is added in Article 500.8(F) it states “Optical fiber cable contains conductors that are capable of carrying current (composite optical fiber cable), the optical fiber cable shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of Article 500, 501, 502, and 503 as applicable.”  It doesn’t mention nonconductive fiber optic cable.

Please confirm that non-conductive fiber optic cable routed in a Class 2 Div 1 rated area is required installed in rigid conduit and the boxes and fittings shall be threaded bosses connections and the conduits are sealed with electrical sealing putty per 502.15.

Additionally non-conductive fiber routed in a Class 2 Division 2 requires only be routed in rigid, intermediate, emt, dust tight wireways, dust tight fittings and enclosures and sealed with electrical sealing putty per 502.15

Thanks, Jim Gavin

A

Answer:

Hey Jim thanks for your question. Some of the confusion has been addressed because the words "with or without current carrying conductors" have been added to 500.8(F) in the2017 NEC. So yes optical fiber cable in a Class II Division 1 location must be installed in threaded right metal conduit or threaded steel intermediate conduit as stated in 502.10(A)(1)(4). The boxes and fittings in Class II Division 1 locations must have threaded bosses and be dusttight as stated in 502.10(A)(3).

In Class II Division 2 locations electrical metallic tubing, dustight wireways, and cable trays  are also allowed to be used as stated in 502.10(B)(1)(8). The boxes and fittings in Class II Division 2 locations must be dusttight but do not need threaded bosses as stated in 502.10(B)(4)

If a raceway is connected to an enclosure that is required to be dust ignitionproof and one that is not, a means of keeping the dust out is required as stated in 502.15. Electrical sealing putty is allowed as explained in the Informational Note.

ABOUT CQD: The Code Question of the Day (CQD) is NECA and ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Magazine’s flagship National Electrical Code (NEC®) public forum for the industry, sponsored by EATON. The daily distribution of Q&A generates a lively dialogue and shares relative Code-based practical responses.

SUBMIT YOUR CODE QUESTION: Click here to submit a question to for inclusion in an upcoming edition of the Code Question of the Day, or email codequestion@necanet.org

CHARLIE TROUT: Charles M. Trout, better known as Charlie, was a nationally known NEC® expert and author. He served on several NEC® technical committees and is past chairman of CMP-12. In 2006 Charlie was awarded the prestigious Coggeshall Award for outstanding contributions to the electrical contracting industry, codes and standards development, and technical training. Even though Charlie passed away in October of 2015, his work continues in spirit. NECA continues to maintain this question forum for its many subscribers in memory and recognition of all his significant contributions to making the NEC what it is today.

NECA STANDARDS: NECA publishes the National Electrical Installation Standards™ (NEIS™), a series of ANSI-approved performance and quality standards for electrical construction. NEIS can be purchased in the NECA Store in three formats: a printed or  PDF download of a standard or, as an  annual subscription service.

NECA SAFETY PRODUCTS & PUBLICATIONS: NECA produces electrical safety publications and products for the industry including jobsite safety guides, handbooks and resource kits. View a full listing of available resources and products »

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Unless the question requests a response based on a specific edition, all answers are based on the latest edition of NFPA 70® National Electrical Code®.

This correspondence is not a formal interpretation of the NEC® and any responses expressed to the questions are opinions and do not necessarily represent the official position of NECA, NFPA, the NEC Correlating Committee any Code-making panel or other electrical technical committee. In addition, this correspondence is neither intended, nor should it be relied upon, to provide professional consultation or services. 

UPDATE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION PREFERENCES: Subscribe or Unsubscribe from this list.