National Electrical Installation Standards

Standards as High as Your Own

 
?
Tuesday, June 12, 2018

Question:

Re: CQD answer published Thursday, May 10, 2018 - Locking Equipment

In an emergency situation, ‘first responders’ such as firefighters may need to get access to a locked electrical room area or enclosure (as allowed per 110.26(F) , 110.31 & 490.35). Are there requirements or other guidance for enabling access for the first responders into those locked areas, if for example, the qualified persons with the access keys are not available at the time of the emergency.

In other words, the doors are being locked to keep unqualified persons out in normal circumstances, but in an emergency situation, we don’t want to excessively hamper access for the ‘first responders’. Is there any guidance on accommodating access for first responders to locked areas such as this?

Thanks, Chris Walker

A

Answer:

Hey Chris thanks for your follow up question. Not really, at least not in the NEC. There are some rules in 645.10 and 690.12 that include wording about first responders but not rules that specifically prohibit locking doors or equipment enclosures. There are some provisions in other documents such as Fire Codes that authorize fire code officials to require key boxes under certain conditions.

There is an effort to add a rule for outdoor readily accessible emergency disconnecting means for one and two family dwelling units in the 2020 NEC. When the First Draft Report is available, scheduled posting date is July 6, 2018 you can look at the proposed change to add 230.85 based on First Revision No. 8462 and submit any comments you have at nfpa.org/ under the Next Edition Tab. Based on the definition of Accessible, Readily in Article 100 that disconnecting means could still be locked.

The concern you have is valid and has been asked by others. But some firefighters have suggested that locks on doors are not a problem - they have axes, power tools and other techniques to get through them!

ABOUT CQD: The Code Question of the Day (CQD) is NECA and ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR Magazine’s flagship National Electrical Code (NEC®) public forum for the industry, sponsored by EATON. The daily distribution of Q&A generates a lively dialogue and shares relative Code-based practical responses.

SUBMIT YOUR CODE QUESTION: Click here to submit a question to for inclusion in an upcoming edition of the Code Question of the Day, or email codequestion@necanet.org

CHARLIE TROUT: Charles M. Trout, better known as Charlie, was a nationally known NEC® expert and author. He served on several NEC® technical committees and is past chairman of CMP-12. In 2006 Charlie was awarded the prestigious Coggeshall Award for outstanding contributions to the electrical contracting industry, codes and standards development, and technical training. Even though Charlie passed away in October of 2015, his work continues in spirit. NECA continues to maintain this question forum for its many subscribers in memory and recognition of all his significant contributions to making the NEC what it is today.

NECA STANDARDS: NECA publishes the National Electrical Installation Standards™ (NEIS™), a series of ANSI-approved performance and quality standards for electrical construction. NEIS can be purchased in the NECA Store in three formats: a printed or  PDF download of a standard or, as an  annual subscription service.

NECA SAFETY PRODUCTS & PUBLICATIONS: NECA produces electrical safety publications and products for the industry including jobsite safety guides, handbooks and resource kits. View a full listing of available resources and products »

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Unless the question requests a response based on a specific edition, all answers are based on the latest edition of NFPA 70® National Electrical Code®.

This correspondence is not a formal interpretation of the NEC® and any responses expressed to the questions are opinions and do not necessarily represent the official position of NECA, NFPA, the NEC Correlating Committee any Code-making panel or other electrical technical committee. In addition, this correspondence is neither intended, nor should it be relied upon, to provide professional consultation or services. 

UPDATE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION PREFERENCES: Subscribe or Unsubscribe from this list.